Scrum Methodology
Learn the Scrum Methodology
The Scrum methodology of agile software development marks a dramatic departure from waterfall management. In fact, Scrum and other agile processes were inspired by its shortcomings. The Scrum methodology emphasizes communication and collaboration, functioning software, and the flexibility to adapt to emerging business realities — all attributes that suffer in the rigidly ordered waterfall paradigm.
9th
SEP
Scrum Product Owner
Posted by admin under Scrum Basics
There are three fundamental roles in the Scrum method of agile software development: the Product Owner, the ScrumMaster, and the team. I’ll begin by discussing the Product Owner because it is the most demanding of the roles.
In Scrum, the Product Owner is the one person responsible for a project’s success. The Product Owner leads the development effort by conveying his or her vision to the team, outlining work in the scrum backlog, and prioritizing it based on business value. Of course, he or she must also consider the stakeholders (to make sure their interests are included in the release) and the team (to make sure the release is developed by the deadline and within budget). As such, the Product Owner must be available to the team to answer questions and deliver direction.
But this combination of authority and availability to the development team makes it hard for the Scrum Product Owner not to micro-manage. Scrum values self-organization and, as a result, the Product Owner must respect the team’s ability to create its own plan of action. This means that a Product Owner is forbidden to give the team more work in the middle of the sprint. Even if requirements change or a rival organization unveils a new product that renders the team’s work all for naught, the Scrum Product Owner is discouraged from altering the sprint until the next sprint planning meeting. However, the Product Owner may cancel a Sprint when necessary. One Product Owner I know cancels Sprints once or twice per year tops.
Furthermore, it is the Product Owner’s responsibility to consider which activities will produce the most business value. This means making tough decisions—that the team might not appreciate—during sprint planning. However, the Product Owner is the one person who must face the music if the project crashes and burns. Therefore, he or she must aggressively determine which features of a product are most important, when they are developed, etc. Just as the development team must produce the negotiated work for the Product Owner, the Product Owner must deliver the product to the customer.
The responsibilities of the Product Owner are also described about halfway through this video module:

posted by: scrum methodology
Comments Feed Reader's Comments
Leave a Reply
Recent Posts
- Scrum based funding model – 20 percent May 9, 2013
- What is Agile ALM April 2, 2013
- MJは6月と7月の2ヶ月間、日本に滞在する予定です。スクラムのコーチングまたはトレーニングに興味のある方は是非ご連絡ください。 March 14, 2013
- The Next Big Idea March 5, 2013
- On Being Available February 17, 2013
Events
Click to Follow Laszlo on Twitter
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- November 2010
- September 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008


[...] I read about the roles in other agile approaches — Scrum Masters, Product Owners, Chief Architects, and Domain Experts — the essence of mentoring and passing on the way of [...]
[...] has three fundamental roles: Product Owner, ScrumMaster, and team [...]
[...] ett traditionellt Scrum-team är produktägaren den som prioriterar vad som ska utvecklas, den som har en vision om en produkt och den som ska [...]
“In Scrum, the Product Owner is the one person responsible for a project’s success.”
Seriously? I think this is seriously overstated. There is no one person responsible for a project’s success, regardless of whether you are doing waterfall or agile, scrum or XP.
There’s no question that there must be a Product Owner. But “the one person”? No.
There is a free Product Owner position description here http://www.clarus.co.nz/downloads/product-owner-job-description.html if it is of interest to anyone.
[...] most successful technique we implemented to get our Product Owners (PO) to increase their involvement with our Agile process was to encourage a ticket writing [...]
[...] has three fundamental roles: Product Owner, ScrumMaster, and team [...]
[...] on the department) can last several hours and encompasses the entire team. It’s where the project (or product) owner moves ideas out of the icebox and into the backlog based on the project’s requirements. [...]
[...] are three fundamental roles in the Scrum method of agile software development: the Product Owner, the ScrumMaster, and the team. The second role I’d like to examine is the ScrumMaster, who, [...]
“Even if requirements change or a rival organization unveils a new product that renders the team’s work all for naught, the Scrum Product Owner cannot alter the sprint until the next sprint planning meeting.”
Really? So as a business owner expecting to see a benefit from adopting scrum, you’re telling me that I need to invest in a whole bunch of work that will be thrown away simply to maintain the purity of the process?? Come on! I’ll wager that if it is your dollars being wasted on your team doing pointless work, you’d soon adopt a more pragmatic view.
It’s a good approach, and works well in my experience, but it’s throwaway comments like this that immediately put the barriers up.
[...] jobbar på varsin modern webbyrå och fick vart och ett tillfälle att träffa den tänkta kunden/produktägaren för Trader-projektet. Detta var webbyråns första kontakt med den potentiella kunden, Olle Nider, [...]
some Swedish stuff – I think.
Can there be more than 1 product owner? If the product is complicated and the requirements challenging, can’t there be a team of product owners?
Thanks Stella for the question. we can set up things in a number of ways. One way is to have 1 Product Owner (PO) per 1 Scrum Team working against 1 or more product backlogs. If you have multiple teams working against 1 or more backlogs then yes you will end up with multiple POs working together. This means that that there will indeed be a heirarchy to that group with a “uber-PO” at the top. Bas Vodde and Craig Larman write about it at great detail in their book here. The other way to do this is to have 1 PO across multiple teams but I haven’t seen that work in practice very well so I wouldn’t really recommend it.
@Matt,
The “whole bunch of work that will be thrown away” would be the work that you (or your PO) just told the team to do. In extreme situations, as the article states, the PO may cancel the sprint. But if this becomes frequent, perhaps your sprint length should be shortened, or practice better judgement on what you put into the sprint.
Thanks Edward for the response.